A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning future neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal internet site in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members home at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Situations posting about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a remarkably publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, search for to create their loved ones dwelling. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying constructed by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their setting up permission by creating a wall over and above the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment on the Unique Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result locations are subject to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, specifically in the delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly built, is in the proper place. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to protect their view, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waist-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic on the depth of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were being meant to Acquire visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Instances described, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water during significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the location became One of the more striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically wanting to establish a relatives home in accordance Along with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised programs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 throughout a storm, will not change the fundamental details.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as increasingly typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of midsection-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an extreme method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket must determine whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend beyond that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable proceed to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.